You have our trilingual online publication in front of you. We hope you will take your time to read it and recommend us further. We are happy to inform you about new publications with our newsletter.
by Alfred de Zayas,* Geneva
(6 March 2026) We are complicit in the US/Israel aggression against Iran if we accept the pretext that this was a “pre-emptive war”. This time the pretext is even weaker than in 2003 with Hussein's alleged “weapons of mass destruction”.
by Norbert Häring*
(6 March 2026) A ban on social media for children and young people is being pushed worldwide, supposedly to protect them. It is being driven by a global “elite” that has abused and tormented young people and children for decades and continues to protect the perpetrators to this day. In reality, they want to put an end to unmonitored use of the internet.
by Guy Mettan*, Geneva
(6 March 2026) As the war in Ukraine drags on, a small diplomatic window seems to be opening. With its tradition of neutrality and mediation, Switzerland could seize this opportunity to build on its historical role and contribute to reviving the momentum for peace.
by Dr Sabine Vuilleumier-Koch*
(6 March 2026) While Switzerland’s “Federal Office of Public Health” (FOPH) continues to claim that the available mRNA vaccines are “safe and well tolerated”, lawyers and doctors are joining forces with National Councillor Rémy Wyssmann to call for a “moratorium on modRNA vaccines”.1 Alarming scientific findings justify this. Facts, the legal situation and political demands were presented on 23 February 2026 at a media conference held by the “Aktionsbündnis freie Schweiz” (ABF Switzerland) in Bern. – This can be viewed in full.2
by Dr. phil. René Roca, Research Institute for Direct Democracy*
(6 March 2026) In the debate surrounding Swiss neutrality, there are repeated calls for Switzerland, i.e. the Federal Council and Parliament, to morally condemn aggressors and violations of international law.
by Prof. Glenn Diesen,* Norway
(27 February 2026) (CH-S) Using his home country as an example, the author shows how Norwegian elites secured and continue to seek to secure power and high salaries under the guise of woke “humanitarian” networks. Criticism of this is considered treason. Hopefully, objective and well-documented analyses will soon be published from other countries.